Return of the Prodigal Son, Rembrandt, 1662 (public domain)
“The church is full of hypocrites!”
“Don’t worry—there’s always room for one more!” – Overheard
The charge of hypocrisy among “church people” is sometimes fair. In an age when morality seems to be up for grabs, some Christians get frustrated and sound rather holier-than-thou. Jesus came down hard on that attitude—like his scathing portrait of the older brother in the story of the prodigal son.
It’s not hard to pick out that brother in Rembrandt’s famous painting of the Prodigal Son. He stands off to the side, looking down his nose at the grace of the father. We’re all somewhere between 0 and 100% when it comes to putting pride to death. And grace provides a resource to admit it.
So here’s the big question
How does the Christian story of grace actually make people better—not just “better than”?
Is it reasonable to believe that following a first-century carpenter, trusting the precepts of an ancient book, could actually reshape a person from the inside out?
Before answering that, it helps to look at the alternatives.
Because whether we name it or not, every one of us lives by some organizing story—some vision of what matters and why. We all trust something. Not everyone writes it down or joins a church, but we all center our lives around a set of unprovable assumptions. And over time, those assumptions don’t just guide what we think. They shape who we become.
Let’s look at a few of those default belief systems—and then ask which one actually has the power to form people into something more whole, more humble, more beautifully human.
Mind your own business
The idea that everyone should just “mind their own business” has worked for a while—not because it’s inherently strong, but because it’s been floating downstream on the moral momentum of Judeo-Christian values. Ideas like human dignity, individual rights, and care for the vulnerable didn’t emerge from thin air; they took root after Christianity reshaped Roman culture.
But what happens when that moral momentum slows down—when fewer people actually believe in the spiritual framework that produced those values in the first place? Something else will step in to fill the vacuum.
That’s what began to happen in 1920s Europe. As Christianity drifted to the margins, moral confusion crept in. With no shared center to hold society together, people became anxious. The promise of individual freedom gave way to a longing for order. Enter the strong man. The rest is history.
Sound familiar?
“Minding your own business” sounds polite—until you realize it abdicates the responsibility to speak into what kind of society we’re becoming.
To each his own
Thomas Kuhn used the term paradigm to represent a person’s hidden grid of assumptions, the lens In the language of modern life, “to each his own” feels like wisdom. It comes dressed as tolerance—a live-and-let-live ethic that helps people coexist without shouting matches at every intersection. And to be fair, a little pluralism can be a good thing. It keeps the temperature in the room livable.
But it was G.K. Chesterton who warned, “Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions.” The problem isn’t tolerance—it’s when tolerance becomes the highest good. When “to each his own” becomes the guiding principle of public life, convictions get flattened. Everything becomes equally valid—or equally irrelevant.
Ironically, this kind of pluralism can become its own form of superiority: “We’re not like those judgmental types—we’re tolerant.” But even tolerance has limits. When real conflicts of values arise—as they always do—some conviction will get codified into law. The question isn’t whether someone’s worldview will shape public life, but whose.
All Roads Lead to Rome
“All roads lead to Rome” sounds generous, as if we’re just setting more chairs at the table. But this approach doesn’t merely tolerate different faiths—it blends them into a spiritual smoothie. It’s rooted in Enlightenment thinking, most notably Immanuel Kant, who argued that religions may be personally meaningful but none of them are objectively true.
To support this view, people often tell the story of the blind men and the elephant: each one touches a different part—ear, trunk, side—but none sees the whole. The moral? No religion has the full truth. They all just grasp part of it.
But, as Lesslie Newbigin points out, there’s a flaw: the person telling that story is claiming to see the whole elephant. In other words, they assume the very god’s-eye view they say no one has. That’s not neutral—it’s a worldview too.
Charles Taylor calls this assumption the Immanent Frame—the belief that only what can be seen, touched, or measured is real. It’s the secular air we breathe. But it’s not proven. It’s not even self-aware. And yet it claims exclusive rights to define reality.
Christianity
Even Christians can lapse into a “better-than” posture. But Christianity itself gives them the one thing that can dismantle it: grace.
The unconditional acceptance of grace allows people to face the brutal truth about themselves—without despair. It removes the need to pretend, defend, or inflate. Søren Kierkegaard put it best:
“Christianity did not come to establish heroic virtues, but to remove self-centeredness and establish love.”
How?
Look at the cross.
As his enemies nailed him to a Roman execution beam, Jesus didn’t curse them or call down wrath. He looked at them—and prayed they’d be forgiven. Christians realize: we hold the hammer and nails, too. And yet, we’re met not with fury but with mercy.
That gaze of forgiveness changes everything. It pulls us out of the center of our own story. No longer needing to prove ourselves or be “better than,” we’re finally free to love others from the security of being loved first.
So can you be confident in what Christianity uniquely offers, yet humble about yourself?
Sure—as long as you’re not like the guy who won the humility award… and then lost it for showing up to accept it.
John Newton, the former slave trader turned pastor who wrote Amazing Grace, captured the spirit of Christian humility perfectly:
“I am not what I ought to be. I am not what I want to be. I am not what I hope to be in another world. But still—I am not what I once used to be, and by the grace of God, I am what I am.”
That’s the voice of someone who no longer has to be better—just grateful.
Closing note: In Jesus day the word hypocrite (hypokrites) just meant “actor.” Near Nazareth where he grew up was one of the largest outdoor theaters in the region. “Actor” became a ready illustration to check those who practiced faith outwardly but not inwardly. Jesus gave it the connotation that defines the word today.
Leave a Reply